What's new
  • Click the moon on the top right (next to your profile picture) to change to Dark Mode

Guns N Roses World Tour 2026 - You Get Nothing, You Lose, Good Day Sir !

I dont know about Walmart. I havent checked in a long time. Have you? You were wrong about Target so Im not just gonna take your word for it. If Walmart sells them Id be shocked if they get their own dedicated shelf like they used to, but I could be wrong. Amazon, as I pointed out already, sells a lot of out of print resale stuff. But yeah, Im sure theres some new DVDs on there.

You're unneccessarily argumentitive. I wasnt claiming that DVDs literally stopped existing. I was making a rhetorical point. DaddyDont understood exactly what I was saying. And I think you did too. You're just obsessed with debating me....for some reason.

In order for my original post to be "blatantly false" it would need to be a statement. Not a question. But if you want me to concede Im wrong anyways and admit DVDs exist, Im happy to do it. Whatever. Not everything needs to be an argument.
Borki your know it all personality is fucking exhausting.

If you find me to be argumentative that's fine. I have zero obsession with you. You are the one posting here instead on your discord.
 
Borki your know it all personality is fucking exhausting.

If you find me to be argumentative that's fine. I have zero obsession with you.

You're the one starting pointles, unneccessary, pedantic debates. Youre arguing about whether DVDs exist dude. You make statements about how I "lack basic comprehension" and "basic logic" and "basic reading skills". THAT is being a know it all. I have never said that about you. I dont even understand what you're accusing me of claiming to know. Im literally an admitted highschool dropout junkie with cognitive issues and actual brain damage. I have said that consistently. I dont claim to know much of anything. Let alone "it all". Why are you always so obsessed with debating over nothing?

You are the one posting here instead on your discord

So what? Like....what's the relevance? You've also posted on Discord while posting here iirc. Multiple accounts here are on "my" Discord or someone elses. I also post on Reddit occasionally. I post YouTube comments. Multiple social media platforms exist. What's the point? I need to pick one?

I will continue to post wherever I see fit, and you will continue to fail to dictate where that is.
 
Last edited:
You're the one starting pointles, unneccessary, pedantic debates while claiming I "lack basic comprehension" and "basic logic". THAT is being a know it all. I dont even understand what you're accusing me of claiming to know. Im literally an admitted highschool dropout, junkie with below average intellegence. I have said that consistently. Why are you so obsessed with debating over nothing?



So what? Like....what's the relevance? You've also posted on Discord while posting here iirc. I also post on Reddit. I post YouTube comments sometimes. Multiple social media platforms exist. What's the point?

I will continue to post wherever I see fit, and you will continue to fail to dictate where that is.
My point was obvious if i was obsessed with you wouldn't i post in your discord to interact with you ?

Instead i post here a place that i help create with hgh and others so it would seem im not obsessed with you.

Do you not see you lecturing others on religion where you yourself only became a Christian in last few years as a good example of my statement you come across as a know it all.

You asked earlier in this thread to be caught up on the recent happenings could you not just read the last few pages instead of asking ?
 
My point was obvious if i was obsessed with you wouldn't i post in your discord to interact with you ?

I said youre obsessed with *arguing* with me. And I could speculate, but Im not interested in psychoanlyzing you.

Do you not see you lecturing others on religion where you yourself only became a Christian in last few years as a good example of my statement you come across as know it all.

So you called me a know it all in this thread over something in another thread? While complaining recently about threads not being sufficiently on topic. Lol.

You'd have to actually show me an example of me lecturing someone on religion in a know it all fashion. If youre talking about the thread literally titled "To any Christians" where Lacerda made a post and then followed it up with another post where the entirety of its contents where "@Borki" - yeah, I was asked for my opinion. And I gave it. One does not need to be an expert on Christianity to advocate for it. Every time I speak of religion I always make it very clear that I am a laymen with limited knowledge (and a wretched sinner). In fact the entire fucking point of what I was saying in that thread is that we are all limited in our capacity to understand the faith and CANT know it all. A direct quote from me in that thread.

"the depths of my knowledge are....a fucking kiddy pool. But I dont need to have insane knowledge. I only need to have good epistomology. And I do. Because its not mine."

My entire point was advocating leaning on the Church and her wisdom. Not ourselves. And that conversation is not a lecture. Its two people having a good natured discussion about their faith. And its me doing what my religion tells me to do, in a thread about my religion, made for people who practice it, where I was specifically summoned and asked for my perspective. And my perspective was to essentially say - "meh, my perspective actually isnt super important, because Im an idiot. Trust the Church". Of all the times to call someone a know it all, thats possibly the worst. My point was literally about how I do not and cannot know it all (and neither can anyone else). But if you want to discuss it further.....Id recommend just talking about it in the thread. Not arguing about whether DVDs exist, religion or any other gripe you have with me here.

You asked earlier in this thread to be caught up on the recent happenings could you not just read the last few pages instead of asking ?

You're seriously still going on about this? We already discussed it. Weeks ago. See, this is why I tnink youre obsessed with arguing with me. Let it go.
 
Last edited:
I said youre obsessed with *arguing* with me. And I could speculate, but Im not interested in psychoanlyzing you.



So you called me a know it all in this thread over something in another thread? While complaining recently about threads not being sufficiently on topic. Lol.

You'd have to actually show me an example of me lecturing someone on religion in a know it all fashion. If youre talking about the thread literally titled "To any Christians" where Lacerda made a post and then followed it up with another post where the entirety of its contents where "@Borki" - yeah, I was asked for my opinion. And I gave it. One does not need to be an expert on Christianity to advocate for it. Every time I speak of religion I always make it very clear that I am a laymen with limited knowledge (and a wretched sinner). In fact the entire fucking point of what I was saying in that thread is that we are all limited in our capacity to understand the faith and CANT know it all. A direct quote from me in that thread.

"the depths of my knowledge are....a fucking kiddy pool. But I dont need to have insane knowledge. I only need to have good epistomology. And I do. Because its not mine."

My entire point was advocating leaning on the Church and her wisdom. Not ourselves. And that conversation is not a lecture. Its two people having a good natured discussion about their faith. And its me doing what my religion tells me to do, in a thread about my religion, made for people who practice it, where I was specifically summoned and asked for my perspective. And my perspective was to essentially say - "meh, my perspective actually isnt super important, because Im an idiot. Trust the Church". Of all the times to call someone a know it all, thats possibly the worst. My point was literally about how I do not and cannot know it all (and neither can anyone else). But if you want to discuss it further.....Id recommend just talking about it in the thread. Not arguing about whether DVDs exist, religion or any other gripe you have with me here.



You're seriously still going on about this? We already discussed it. Weeks ago. See, this is why I tnink youre obsessed with arguing with me. Let it go.
You just worte another rambling going in circles wall of text.

You're not qualified to psychoanalyze anyone.

Btw if i was obsessed arguing with you wouldn't i be posting in the broskirose LeVodkaJuice thread ( that's me pointing out your lack of comprehension again)
 
You got me Borki ! I don't shop at Target.

Walmart, Amazon and other places sell Taylor Swift DVDs right ?

So my original statement is accurate minus target correct ?
Since i didn't mention best buy and your orginal post i qouted was blatantly false.

Right Borki ?

Lots of things you buy on Walmart.com are actually third party sellers. Sorry if I'm coming across as a know it all lol! Seriously though buying physical media is probably not a bad idea even if you can watch it for free online. Youtube will inevitably find a way to charge a monthly subscription fee to watch full concerts. I've gotten at least one physical copy of most of my favorite bands over the past few years. I forget the name of the movie (edit: leave the world behind) but the moral of the story was that if the internet were to go haywire someday people with physical media would have a goldmine. It was that movie with Julia Roberts where all the self driving Teslas ended up in one big pile.
 

Lots of things you buy on Walmart.com are actually third party sellers. Sorry if I'm coming across as a know it all lol! Seriously though buying physical media is probably not a bad idea even if you can watch it for free online. Youtube will inevitably find a way to charge a monthly subscription fee to watch full concerts. I've gotten at least one physical copy of most of my favorite bands over the past few years. I forget the name of the movie (edit: leave the world behind) but the moral of the story was that if the internet were to go haywire someday people with physical media would have a goldmine. It was that movie with Julia Roberts where all the self driving Teslas ended up in one big pile.
Why would i think you're coming across as a know it all bro ? I am probably missing the sarcasm or it's lost in translation.

My point was Walmart does sell concrete DVDs or blu rays if they are released on physical media and not sold or licensed to streaming platforms.

You won't find rare shit but Taylor Swift or Michael Jackson or a Elvis dvd are still at physical locations.

Would Guns N' Roses get a spot on the shelf probably not.
 
Doesn't walmart sell GNR shirts, socks, etc? If there's still a section for concert blu rays I'd be surprised if there wasn't GNR, Pink Floyd, AC/DC and whatever other brands sell their merch there.

I've been adding to my physical album collection recently. Movies and tv shows have always been easy enough to download and I rarely even watch things on a tv, but my external hard drive died and now I kinda regret not collecting that stuff too...
 
You just worte another rambling going in circles wall of text.

And you just refused to address even a single point. Which is fine. Because Id rather move on. Idk how I went in circles. I am a bit of a rambler. But thats just how I am.

You're not qualified to psychoanalyze anyone.

Never said I was, and specifically said I wasnt going to.

Btw if i was obsessed arguing with you wouldn't i be posting in the broskirose LeVodkaJuice thread

I wrote a lot more, but in the interest of peace and getting back on topic (and to spare you from another "ramble") I will take you at your word that youre not obsessed with arguing, and hold you to it.

that's me pointing out your lack of comprehension again

Im not surprised. I hope its the last time. (But I doubt it.)
 

Lots of things you buy on Walmart.com are actually third party sellers. Sorry if I'm coming across as a know it all lol! Seriously though buying physical media is probably not a bad idea even if you can watch it for free online. Youtube will inevitably find a way to charge a monthly subscription fee to watch full concerts. I've gotten at least one physical copy of most of my favorite bands over the past few years. I forget the name of the movie (edit: leave the world behind) but the moral of the story was that if the internet were to go haywire someday people with physical media would have a goldmine. It was that movie with Julia Roberts where all the self driving Teslas ended up in one big pile.

Yeah, a lot of those classic DVDs are just totally out of print now. And if you do find them online, theyre much more expensive than they used to be because third party resellers are taking advantage of the scarcity. Lots of DVDs I grew up watching are now basically collectors items.

Some bands are just uploading full concert films on YouTube. Which sucks because they put ads on it. Or even worse, it's uploaded in shit quality by a fan in a weird aspect ratio with 2 songs missing cuz of copyright.
 
Why would i think you're coming across as a know it all bro ? I am probably missing the sarcasm or it's lost in translation.

My point was Walmart does sell concrete DVDs or blu rays if they are released on physical media and not sold or licensed to streaming platforms.

You won't find rare shit but Taylor Swift or Michael Jackson or a Elvis dvd are still at physical locations.

Would Guns N' Roses get a spot on the shelf probably not.
You missed the sarcasm. All good Bill.
 
Hey Borki go fuck yourself with passive aggressive talk like that.

It wasnt even passive agressive. Just honest. (And true - as you just proved. You're obsessed with arguing. Even when I end the conversation peacefully, you still want to keep going) I mean, even if it was passive agressive, that would be a pretty reasonable way to respond to "this is me pointing out your lack of comprehension again", no?
 
Last edited:
It wasnt even passive agressive. Just honest. (And true - as you just proved. You're obsessed with arguing. Even when I end the conversation peacefully, you still want to keep going) I mean, even if it was passive agressive, that would be a pretty reasonable way to respond to "this is me pointing out your lack of comprehension again", no?
Borki accuses someone of being argumentative and continues arguing with the person, Then tries to show his intellect by using the lack of comprehension argument the other person has accused Borki of multiple times.

Clearly showing Borki lacks comprehension :pepelol:
 
Borki accuses someone of being argumentative and continues arguing with the person, Then tries to show his intellect by using the lack of comprehension argument the other person has accused Borki of multiple times.

Clearly showing Borki lacks comprehension :pepelol:

I never said you lack comprehension. As you pointed out, thats your line. Tried to show my intellect? By telling you Im not being passive agressive? Are you using your intellect now? Don't we all need to use our intellect to some capacity to make a post or argue literally any point? Even something as trivial as whether or not DVDs exist, who has more Walmart experience, whether a post is 1 or 2 away from another, etc.

You're the one claiming that I lack comprehension skills, reading skills and basic logic. I havent insulted your intelligence, or propped up my own or started any of these arguments. On the contrary, I said that Im a highschool dropout with brain damage. Why are you so obsessed with proving that youre smarter than someone who doesnt even think theyre smart and doesnt give a shit who is more intelligent? You may very well be smarter than me. But...who cares?

You seem to be talking out of both sides of your mouth. On one hand youre not obsessed with arguing (supposedly). But on the other hand - you constantly call me a know it all, and seem to be foaming at the mouth to debate about the silliest things. Even to the point where you ascribe straw man positions to me (remember Venezuela?) so you can argue against them. The implication seems to be that the know it all must have his face rubbed in the dirt and suffer a devestating blow to his intellect. So you pick fights anywhere you can. No matter how silly. Obsessed with owning me and winning the debate so I can be shamed by my own stupidity. But....youre the only one who seems to think Im intelligent. I dont think Im smart. I dont think anyone else thinks Im smart. I can just concede for you now that youre smarter than me if that will make you happy. I dont think its something to brag about, but if its important to you - fine. You win. Im an idiot. Im not even being sarcastic. I mean I cant measure your IQ, but I think most people understand that druggies with brain damage, cognitive problems and a 10th grade education are not very smart people. Can we please move on now?
 
Last edited:
If I didn’t already know Carpenter was their drummer and you asked me to guess his affiliation with the band I would say he is Dizzy Reed’s boyfriend.
If he was black i would have thought he was one of their backup singers.
Ill give the sex pistols and KISS props with their reunion, they did it with all original members.
 
If he was black i would have thought he was one of their backup singers.
Ill give the sex pistols and KISS props with their reunion, they did it with all original members.

Fuck man, when Adler did those guest spots they sounded...like Guns N Fuckin Roses again.
Of course they couldn't have Adler on board full time, that would have actually been awesome and we had to have old Thunderchucker shitting things up.

I reckon Izzy Stradlin would and could have done the job too, any and all shit talk and conjecture aside.
 
Back
Top